THE GENESIS OF COGNITIVE WARFARE: HISTORICAL RETROSPECTIVE AND CONTEMPORARY PARADIGMS

Authors

Keywords:

сognitive warfare, рaradigm, intelligentized warfare, stratagems, disinformation, neurotechnology, hybrid warfare

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the evolution and current state of cognitive warfare as a strategic dimension of global security. In the context of a globalized information society, the author explores how traditional paradigms of conflict are shifting toward a «fifth domain» of warfare where the human mind–both conscious and subconscious–becomes the primary battlefield. The study examines the transformation of communicative processes, where rapid information dissemination and manipulative digital technologies have replaced conventional kinetic force as the most effective means of undermining national sovereignty.

The theoretical framework traces the lineage of cognitive influence from ancient stratagems to modern neuroscience. By analyzing Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War” and the “Thirty-Six Stratagems”, the author demonstrates that contemporary cognitive operations are digital reinterpretations of classical deception and psychological manipulation. The research highlights the technological trajectory that enabled mass cognitive influence, from the printing press to the current era of Artificial Intelligence and social media algorithms.

Special attention is given to the concepts of «intelligentized warfare» and «reflexive control,» which form the basis of what is termed the «war of cogs.» The article analyzes the strategic approaches of global actors, specifically the Russian Federation's use of disinformation to erode social cohesion and the People's Republic of China's integration of AI and neurotechnology to achieve cognitive dominance.

Protecting national identity, historical memory, and social trust against «stratagems of the 21st century» is essential for survival. The paper posits that in the modern era, victory is determined not by territorial conquest, but by the ability to maintain cognitive autonomy and critical thinking in the face of total algorithmic manipulation.

Author Biography

Tetiana BEVZ, Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the NAS of Ukraine

Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor

References

Urusova, V., & Nykolyshyna, O. (Trans.). (2016). 36 stratagem [36 stratagems]. Kharkiv: Folio [In Ukrainian].

Bjork, P., & Henshke, A. (2022). «U mene svoia pravda... a v tebe yaka? shliakh vid aktyvnykh zakhodiv do kohnityvnoi viiny pid chas rosiiskoho vtorhnennia v Ukrainu» [«I have my own truth... what's yours? the path from active measures to cognitive warfare during the Russian invasion of Ukraine»]. Stratehichna panorama, (2), 12–27 [In Ukrainian].

Sun Tzu. (n.d.). Mystetstvo viiny [The art of war]. Retrieved from https://uabook.com.ua/book/mystecztvo-vijny/ [In Ukrainian].

Harari, Y. N. (2025). Nexus. Korotka istoriia informatsiinykh merezh vid kamianoho viku do ShI [Nexus: A brief history of information networks from the Stone Age to AI]. Kyiv: BookChef [In Ukrainian].

Freedman, L. (2024). Stratehiia: istoriia [Strategy: A history]. Kharkiv: Folio [In Ukrainian].

Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. (2024). U.S. Department of Defense. https://media.defense.gov/2024/Dec/18/2003615520/-1/-1/0/MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA-2024.PDF

Autellet, E. (2022). Cognitive warfare: Contribution of the French Armed Forces Deputy Chief of Defence. HAL. https://hal.science/hal-03635887v1/file/NATO-CSO-CW%202022-03-01%20%28US%29%20Autellet.pdf

Brittain-Hale, A. (2023). “Slava Ukraini: A Psychobiographical Case Study of Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s Public Diplomacy Discourse”. Pepperdine Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd/1367/

Brittain-Hale, A. (2023, December 14) Clausewitzian Theory Of War In The Age Of Cognitive Warfare. https://tdhj.org/blog/post/clausewitz-cognitive-warfare/

Bryc, A., & Domańska, M. (2024, September 9). Russia in the trenches of cognitive warfare. New Eastern Europe. https://neweasterneurope.eu/2024/09/09/russia-in-the-trenches-of-cognitive-warfare/

Chinese Military in-depth Analysis of the Latest “Cognitive Warfare” Case in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict. (2024, September 27). Red Dragon 1949. https://reddragon1949.com/russian-cyber-warfare/chinese-military-in-depth-analysis-of-the-latest-cognitive-warfare-case-in-the-russia-ukraine-conflict/

Claverie, B., & Cluzel, F. du. (2023). The Cognitive Warfare Concept. NATO Innovation Hub. https://innovationhub-act.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CW-article-Claverie-du-Cluzel-final_0.pdf

Deppe C. and Schaal G.S. (2024). Cognitive warfare: a conceptual analysis of the NATO ACT cognitive warfare exploratory concept. Front. Big Data 7:1452129. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2024.145212.https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/big-data/articles/10.3389/fdata.2024.1452129/full

Deppe, C., and Schaal, G. S. (2022). Vernetzte Desinformationskampagnen: Der Fall Nawalny. #GIDSresearch. Available at: https://openhsu.ub.hsu-hh.de/handle/10.24405/14603

Gisselsson N. D., Alberto R. (2025, July 18). Cognitive warfare: why wars without bombs or bullets are a legal blind spot. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/cognitive-warfare-why-wars-without-bombs-or-bullets-are-a-legal-blind-spot-260607

Hellström, J., Kallioniemi, P., Kytöneva, S., & Puranen, M. (2024). StratCom | NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence Riga, Latvia. Riga, Latvia: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. Available at: https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/are-russian-narratives-amplified-by-prc-media-a-case-study-on-narratives-related-to-swedens-and-finlands-nato-applications/298

Hung, T. C., & Hung, T. W. (2022). How China's cognitive warfare works: a frontline perspective of Taiwan's anti-disinformation wars. Journal of Global Security Studies, 7:ogac016. doi: 10.1093/jogss/ogac016

Koichiro, T. (2022, July 22). The Future of China’s Cognitive Warfare: Lessons from the War in Ukraine. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2022/07/the-future-of-chinas-cognitive-warfare-lessons-from-the-war-in-ukraine/

Mueller, R. S. (2019). Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 448.

MWI Video: The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future – Dr. James Giordano. (2018, October 29). Modern War Institute at West Point. https://mwi.westpoint.edu/mwi-video-brain-battlefield-future-dr-james-giordano/

Rothe, H. A. (2009). Clausewitz’s “Wondrous Trinity” as a coordinate system of war and violent conflict. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 3, 204–219. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/IJCV.6

Splidsboel, H., F. (2021). When Russia wages war in the cognitive domain. Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 34(2), 181–201. DOI: 10.1080/13518046.2021.199056

Van Herpen, M. H. (2016). Putin’s propaganda machine: Soft power and Russian foreign policy. Ghent University Library. https://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:002353330

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

BEVZ, T. . (2026). THE GENESIS OF COGNITIVE WARFARE: HISTORICAL RETROSPECTIVE AND CONTEMPORARY PARADIGMS. HUMANITARIAN STUDIES: HISTORY AND PEDAGOGY, (1), 12–16. Retrieved from https://gsip.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/gsipen/article/view/336