CONTENT-SEMANTIC FIELD OF THE CONCEPT «BLENDED LEARNING» AND MODELS OF BLENDED LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/gsip2022.01.130Keywords:
blended learning, online learning, digital transformation of education, digital didacticsAbstract
Annotation. The COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine have revealed the shortcomings of distance learning, which is why using it as a basic form of learning in basic educational programs has become not entirely effective. The most promising form of organizing the educational process in the conditions of its digital transformation is mixed learning, which involves alternating online and face-to-face learning formats. The content field and components of the concept of "blended learning" are characterized. Through mixed learning, we understand educational technology with mandatory components, which include contact classes of students with teachers, distance classes containing online communication between the teacher and students, and independent educational work of students, which is effectively organized by teachers. Pedagogical aspects of mixed learning related to its organization and implementation in an educational institution in the joint activity of the teacher and students of education are considered. An analysis of existing approaches to the selection and classification of blended learning models has been carried out. The typology of mixed learning models, which are implemented at different levels: the curriculum, the educational subject, the educational session, and the out-of-class learning technology, are substantiated. It is noted that blended learning models have their own name, and a certain internal integrity and mostly fit into one or another scientific theory. Six models of blended learning are described, which are widely presented by domestic scientists. The proposed typology is based on the joint work of a network of experimental sites. The relationship between the proposed typology of organizational and didactic models of blended learning with other typologies and separate models presented in foreign and domestic publications is shown. The problems of the typology of blended learning models were elaborated and their systematic justification was carried out. A set of criteria for delineating and considering one or another model of blended learning is singled out. It was concluded that technological and pedagogical aspects are combined in blended learning; the use of mixed models of education requires different approaches to the selection and development of educational content, educational materials and their means; the presented typology of blended learning models is an important component of the new digital didactics.
References
Barna O. V. Tekhnolohiia zmishanoho navchannia v kursi metodyky navchannia informatyky. Vidkryte osvitnie e-seredovyshche suchasnoho universytetu. [Technology of blended learning in the course of computer science teaching methods. Open educational e-environment of a modern university] Kyiv, 2016. Vyp. 2. S. 24–37. (in Ukrainian)
Besedin B., Vahner H. Navchalni tekhnolohii KhKhI stolittia: «zmishane navchannia» [Educational technologies of the 21st century: "mixed learning]: zb. nauk. pr. Humanizatsiia navchalno-vykhovnoho protsesu. 2017. № 5 (85). S. 208-217. (in Ukrainian)
Buhaichuk K. L. Zmishane navchannia: teoretychnyi analiz ta stratehiia vprovadzhennia v osvitnii protses vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv. Informatsiini tekhnolohii i zasoby navchannia. [Blended learning: theoretical analysis and implementation strategy in the educational process of higher educational institutions. Information technologies and teaching aids]. Kyiv, 2016. T. 54. Vyp. 4. S. 1–18. (in Ukrainian)
Hurevych R. S., Kademiia M. Yu. Profesiina osvita u vymirakh informatsiinoho suspilstva. Osvita dlia myru [Professional education in the dimensions of the information society. Education for peace: coll. of science pr.: in 2 volumes] : zb. nauk. pr.: u 2 t. K.: Vyd-vo TOV «Iurka Liubchenka», 2019. T.2. S. 211–221. (in Ukrainian)
Kademiia M. Yu., Opushko N. R. Vid tsyfrovizatsii ekonomiky do dyhitalizatsii navchannia. [From the digitalization of the economy to the digitalization of education]. Pedahohichna presa. Trudova pidhotovka v suchasnii shkoli. 2020. S. 8–12. (in Ukrainian)
Kademiia M. Yu., Kizim S. S., Liulchak S. Yu., Savchuk I. V. Realizatsiia zmishanoho navchannia zasobamy tsyfrovoho osvitnoho seredovyshcha. [Implementation of blended learning by means of digital educational environment. Modern information technologies and innovative teaching methods in the training of specialists: methodology, theory, experience, problems] Suchasni informatsiini tekhnolohii ta innovatsiini metodyky navchannia v pidhotovtsi fakhivtsiv: metodolohiia, teoriia, dosvid, problemy. 2021. Vyp. 62. S. 249–256. (in Ukrainian)
Kasian S. P. Zmishane navchannia v zakladi zahalnoi serednoi osvity. [Blended education in a general secondary education institution]. Aktualni problemy v systemi osvity: zahalnoosvitnii zaklad serednoi osvity – do universytetska pidhotovka – zaklad vyshchoi osvity. 2021. №1. S. 147–149. (in Ukrainian)
Kryvonos O. M., Korotun O. V. Zmishane navchannia yak osnova formuvannia IKT-kompetentnosti vchytelia. [Blended learning as a basis for forming teacher's ICT competence.] Naukovi zapysky [Kirovohradskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni V. Vynnychenka]. Seriia: Problemy metodyky fizyko-matematychnoi i tekhnolohichnoi osvity. Kirovohrad, 2015. Vyp. 8 (II). S. 19–23. (in Ukrainian)
Sobchenko T. M. Dydaktychna systema zmishanoho navchannia studentiv filolohichnykh spetsialnostei u zakladakh vyshchoi osvity [Didactic system of mixed education of students of philological majors in institutions of higher education]: dys. ... d-ra ped. nauk : 13.00.09. Kharkiv; Poltava. 2021. 575 s. (in Ukrainian)
Sobchenko T. M. Zmishane navchannia: poniattia ta zavdannia. [Blended learning: concepts and tasks]. Pedahohika formuvannia tvorchoi osobystosti u vyshchii i zahalnoosvitnii shkolakh: zb. nauk. pr. Zaporizhzhia: KPU, 2021. Vyp. 75. S. 73–76. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.32840/1992-5786.2021.75-3.14
Teoriia ta praktyka zmishanoho navchannia: monohr. [Theory and practice of blended learning] /V.M. Kukharenko ta in. Kharkiv. 2016. 284 s. (in Ukrainian)
Tkachuk H. Analiz ta osoblyvosti vprovadzhennia modelei zmishanoho navchannia v osvitnii protses zakladu vyshchoi osvity. [Analysis and features of the implementation of blended learning models in the educational process of a higher education institution]. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia pedahohika. 2018. № 3. S. 28–36. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.25128/2415-3605.18.3.4
Tkachuk H. V. Zmishane navchannia ta osoblyvosti vykorystannia rotatsiinoi modeli u navchalnomu protsesi. [Mixed learning and peculiarities of using the rotational model in the educational process. Information technologies in education]. Informatsiini tekhnolohii v osviti. 2017. № 4 (33). C. 143–156. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000655
Bailey J., Schneider C., Ark T.V. Navigating the Digital Shift: Implementation Strategies for Blended and Online Learning. Digital Learning Now! Smart Series, 2013. 270 p. URL: https://www.gettingsmart.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/DLN-ebook-navigating-PDF.pdf
Bergmann J., Sams A. Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education. 2012. 112 p. URL: https://www.rcboe.org/cms/lib/GA01903614/Centricity/Domain/15451/Flip_your_Classroom.pdf
Blended Learning 101: Handbook / College for Certain. Oakland, CA: ASPIRE Public Schools, 2010. 70 p. URL: https://scottebenson.files.wordpress.com/-2013/06/aspire-blended-learning-handbook-2013-061.pdf
Clifford Maxwell What Blended Learning Is – and Isn’t. URL: https://www.blendedlearning.org/whatblended-learning-is-and-isnt/
Horn M.B., Staker H. The rise of K-12 blended learning. Profiles of emerging models San Mateo, CA: Innosight institute, 2011. 184 p. URL: https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/The-rise-of-K-12-blended-learning.pdf
Reimaging Teaching in a Blended Classroom. Working paper. TNTP: Reimagine Teaching. 2014. 18 p. URL: http://www.k12accountability.org/-resources/Blended-and-Adaptive-Learning/TNTP_Blended_Learning_Working-Paper_2014-2.pdf
Rohbanfard H., Proteau L. Learning through observation: a combination of expert and novice models favors learning. Experimental Brain Research. 2011. Vol. 215. N. 3. P. 183–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2882-x
Rooney J. E. Blending learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings. Association Management. 2003. Vol. 55. P. 26–32.
Staker H., Horn M. Classifying K-12 Blended Learning, 2012. 22 p. URL: http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf/