CIVILIZATIONAL SELF-IDENTIFICATION OF IDENTITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/gsip2023.02.060Keywords:
civilization, identity, self-identification, existence, subjectivity, religion, paradigmAbstract
Abstract. The article is devoted to the socio-philosophical analysis of the problem of formation and development of civilizational self-identification of identity. The phenomenon of civilizational self-identification of identity has long attracted the attention of many researchers and is actively discussed within various social and humanitarian discourses. Three components can be distinguished in the structure of civilizational identity: mentality, locality and globality. Mentality is based on the value-semantic originality of civilization, locality is based on the ability to represent world culture in its context with one's own (ethnic, social, religious, artistic and aesthetic) means, globality indicates the contribution of local civilization to the general culture. It is the interaction of these three modes in the history of every world civilization and, in particular, the Ukrainian one, that gives rise to the dynamics of its civilizational identity. In addition, at the basis of all three modes is a value-semantic component, which is located at different levels, which can be fixed in the civilizational consciousness, which we highlight as one of the foundations of civilizational identity. The basis of civilizational identity is civilizational self-awareness, which is a set of certain spiritual values and ideas that were formed during the centuries of coexistence of nations and ethnic groups that lived in the same territory and were united by a single political system and religion.
References
Veber M. Izbrannoe. Obraz veshchestva [Favorites. The image of matter]. M.: Yuryst, 1994. 380 s. (in Rassian).
Gusserl E. Krizis yevropeiskogo chelovechestva i filosofiya. Logicheskie issledovaniya. Kartezianskie razmishleniya [The crisis of European humanity and philosophy. Logical research. Cartesian reflections]. M.: Nauka, 2000. S. 559-560, 633-634 (in Rassian).
Kondakov I., Sokolov K., Khrenov N. Tsivilizatsionnaya identichnost v perekhodnuyu yepokhu [Civilizational identity in a transitional era]. M.: Prohress-Tradytsyia, 2011. S. 63 (in Rassian).
Kristeva Yu. Sili uzhasa [Forces of terror]. Kharkov: F-Press, KhTsHY; SPb: Alteiia, 2003. S. 37-38; S. 50, 64 (in Rassian).
Noimann I. Ispolzovanie «Drugogo»: obrazi Vostoka v formirovanii yevropeiskoi identichnosti [Using the «Other»: Images of the East in the Formation of European Identity]. M.: Novoe yzdatelstvo, 2004. S. 15 (in Rassian).
Pyrozhkov S. Tsyvilizatsiinyi vybir Ukrainy: paradyhma osmyslennia i stratehiia dii [The civilizational choice of Ukraine: a paradigm of understanding and a strategy of action] (stenohrama naukovoi dopovidi na zasidanni Prezydii NAN Ukrainy 29 bereznia 2017 r.). Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy. 2017. №6. S. 42-50 (in Ukrainian).
Poddashkina O. Transformatsiia tsyvilizatsiinoi identychnosti v umovakh hlobalnykh zmin suchasnoho svitu [Transformation of civilizational identity in the conditions of global changes of the modern world]. Visnyk KhNU im.. V. N. Karazina. 2011. №90. S. 72 (in Ukrainian).
Fevr L. Boi za istoriyu [Fights for history]. M.: Nauka, 1991. S. 237 (in Rassian).
Froid Z. Psikhologiya mass i analiz chelovecheskogo Ya [Mass psychology and analysis of the human self]. M.: Neoclassik, AST, 2017. 256 s. (in Rassian).
Khaidegger M. Bitie i vremya [Being and time]. M.: Nauka, 1997. S. 257. (in Rassian).
Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii [Сlash of civilizations]. Polys. 1994. №1. S. 33-48 (in Rassian).
Boulanger N. L'Antiquite devoilét par ses usages ou Examen critique des principales opinions, ceremonies et institutions reliqieuses et politiques des differens peoples de la terre [Antiquity unveiled by its uses or critical examination of the principal opinions, ceremonies and religious, and political institutions of the different peoples of the earth]. Amsterdam, 1766. Р.78 (in French).
Volkan V. The Need to Have Enemies and Allies: A Developmental Approach. Political Psychology. 1985. 6 June. Р. 219, 243, 247 (in English). https://doi.org/10.2307/3790902
